Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0359920090280030190
Korean Journal of Nephrology
2009 Volume.28 No. 3 p.190 ~ p.198
Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Excretion of Urea in Evaluating Patients with Acute Kidney Injury with Diuretics Treatment
Lim Dae-Hun

Jeong Ji-Min
Oh Seul-Hyun
Lee Hyung-Chul
Choi Joon-Seok
Kim Min-Jee
Park Jeong-Woo
Bae Eun-Hui
Ma Seong-Kwon
Kim Nam-Ho
Kim Soo-Wan
Abstract
Purpose: Although fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) has been used to distinguish transient-acute kidney injury (T-AKI) from persistent-AKI (P-AKI), the availability of FENa in the diagnosis of T-AKI is reported low in patients with diuretics use. We compared the diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea) with that of FENa in patients with diuretics use.

Methods: One hundred seven AKI patients were classified as having T-AKIor P-AKI according to the clinical context. Each group was again subdivided according to exposure to diuretics. According to the cut off value generated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity and specificity of FENa and FEUrea were compared with each other.

Results: The numbers of patients administered with diuretics were 67 out of total 107 AKI patients (63%), 27 out of 52 (52%) of T-AKI patients, and 40 out of total (65) 55 (73%) of P-AKI patients. When the cutoff value of T-AKI was defined as FENa ¡Â1.5 and FEUrea ¡Â30 according to the ROC curves, sensitivity and specificity of FENa were 96% and 100% in non-diuretics group, and 63% and 98% in diuretics group, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of FEUrea were 92% and 87% in nondiuretics group, and 96% and 83% in diuretics group, respectively.

Conclusion: FEUrea is as good as FENa at distinguishing T-AKI from P-AKI in patients administered with diuretics.
KEYWORD
Urea, Kidney failure, Diuretics
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø